Hi Stephen ;

The problem is that we have a lot of legacy code that can't be migrated
right now just because Microsoft thinks it is better the other way, when
the code is working OK.

This desicion is very hostile for legacy systems :-(
 El 10/06/2015 16:53, "Stephen Russell" <[email protected]> escribió:

> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 6:25 AM, Fernando D. Bozzo <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Ok, to continue with this matter, I can confirm that any COM+ component
> can
> > be automatically published as a web-service without the need of the Soap
> > Toolkit on Windows Server 2003.
> >
> > The bad news is that apparently Microsoft decided to quit this good thing
> > to replace it with WCF. I hate them :_(
> >
> >
> >
> https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/c37ac0cb-96c7-405e-8acc-64061afa2e5f/com-as-xml-web-services-on-windows-7-uses-soap-setting?forum=windowsgeneraldevelopmentissues
> >
> > -------------
>
>
> WCF is so much better from my experience in making them and publishing them
> for use.
>
> WCF does json very well.
>
> WCF you have contract objects that other languages can put in easily, java
> for sure as well as python.
>
>
>
> --
> Stephen Russell
> Sr. Analyst
> Ring Container Technology
> Oakland TN
>
> 901.246-0159 cell
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cagq_jukckkz6vmbyctzrndiameovo+n+e+tc1-ejousmsxq...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to