On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:37 AM, < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 2015-02-05 05:18, Man-wai Chang wrote: > >> Maybe Micro$oft just want to be sure that all users would be using at >> least IE 11... so they "obfuscate" references to IE 10 and older >> versions... :) >> > ---------------- If you had 2 versions of your software knowing full well that latest is superior to earlier why would you want people to get the older version? Our ERP vendor has issues with what frigin version of IE & java is loaded to make their stuff work. Absolute nightmare when someone has auto updates for M$ also do the browser as well. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Analyst Ring Container Technology Oakland TN 901.246-0159 cell --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cajidmylnwcamtao_lz-w6gxuhtb7y2pxlee0juzmc5anb+n...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
