There was a Windows 2.0 -- I remember getting the "runtime" bundled with Adobe Pagemaker when my company started Desktop Publishing. But I'm pretty sure Windows New Technology launched at the 3.0 version. I was working at a Microsoft consultancy in Waltham, MA, and we bought PowerPC and MIPS machines to test out the cross-platform servers on new CPUs. Perhaps I'm misremembering, as that was a long, long, long time ago.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 12:22 PM, jeff <[email protected]> wrote: > Wasn't there an NT 2.0? > > > Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Ed Leafe <[email protected]> > Date:10/18/2014 07:02 (GMT-07:00) > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Windows 10 > > On Oct 17, 2014, at 7:39 PM, Ted Roche <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This > > is the company that made: > > > > Windows 3 > > Windows 3.11 > > Windows 95 > > Windows NT > > Windows NT 3.51 > > WIndows 98 > > Windows NT 4 > > Windows Me > > Windows 2000 > > Windows Vista > > Windows 7 > > Windows 8 > > You left out Windows XP. How is that possible, when it fits so nicely into > the above pattern? > > ;-) > > -- Ed Leafe > > > > > > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/signed > text/plain (text body -- kept) > application/pgp-signature > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cacw6n4str8usrugayd0kva5dvd34auwk7lornbyweg6ab4c...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
