On 04/09/2014 06:02 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> Uninstall
> and/or restore back to a previous restore point.
> A previous restore point -- that won't actually do any kind of Uninstall of 
> SW - does it? I figure its only MS OS updates that are affected by a restore 
> point. But, if that is the case - then it may make the PC vulnerable - if it 
> undoes a security update. Right?

I'm not a big fan of restores, but tossed it out there as a last resort
idea. Restores are time machines, and put your software back to an
earlier state. As I have NEVER gotten one to succeed, perhaps i ought to
withdraw the suggestion. Never mind!

> Again - it literally does NOT do any computing during a Build. That
> occurs when you prepare to do a build. -K-

So, if this is a plain vanilla machine, OTHER than having a 3-D printer
hooked up to it, now that you've moved the printer to another machine,
presumably the drivers won't be loaded, leave the machine running to see
if the BSOD happens, If not, it's the drivers.

BSOD is the last option when the kernel runs into something it doesn't
know how to handle, could be hardware that blinks out of existence,
drivers that do things (or fail to do things) they shouldn't, or
software trying to execute things they can't. It's just a process of
elimination to take out one thing at a time until you think you've
isolated the problem, adding it back in and confirming the problem
reappears, then figuring out how to fix it.

-- Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com/

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to