Interested to hear of others experiences and opinions re: tablets, smart
phones, smart TVs, etc.

I think the there is going to be increasing divergence: various highly-specialized computerized single-purpose devices on the one hand, and the ongoing use and development of general-puropose computers on the other.

As an example, medical devices. I'm pretty impressed by my dentist's xray machine, which instantanously puts xray images of my teeth on a desktop computer screen as soon as they are taken, and at much higher resolution than any old-style days-to-completion chemical-process celluloid film xrays were ever capable of. Still, it takes a horrendously large input device to produce those images.

Stephen mentions doctors using tablets to snap images of ... skin lesions, was it? Sure..but that's gonna seem way cumbersome in 20 years or so when the first Star-Trek-style palm-size medical scanners are produced--devices capable not only of producing images but of taking in and analyzing input across a much wider swath of the electro-magnetic spectrum, along with, perhaps, olfactory data. The device may also employ some sort of ultrasound that can determine the texture and density of what it's looking at. Probably such a scanner will need a (most-likely wireless) connection to a much more powerful device to accomplish complete analysis. That device won't be in the public "cloud"; it will be on the premises of a medical office or facility.

People who have 60-inch flat-screen TVs are likely to tire of the novelty of trying to watch movies on 3 or 4 or 5-inch screens that lose most of the detail.

Remember the pocket transistor radio? Smart phones are good for that--not for watching movies or analyzing medical data or for text-entry.

If one wants to be productive writing, filling out complex forms, spread-sheet crunching or producing graphical art--that is, most of the work that goes on in offices--one is going to need a screen at least as large as a sheet of {American) legal-size paper in landscape mode, plus more space for toolbars and reference windows, and input devices that enable precise, rapid, error-free, unambiguous manipulation. In the case of text, that device continues to be a mechanical-button keyboard with buttons large enough, and spaced far enough from each other, to minimize fumble-fingering, and not associated with a touch pad upon which the slightest accidental pressure causes something unwanted to happen on the screen. In other words, a big whomping keyboard and separate mouse. It still doesn't get any better than that, and other devices get a whole lot worse.

Ken Dibble
www.stic-cil.org

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to