On 1/3/2014 6:44 AM, Gérard Lochon wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Johnson" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: SQL Insert - Solved
Sorry to bother you guys with this one. I should have known. I
expected that records inserted in sequence would be queried in the
same sequence. I counted the records this morning and they are all
there. Just out of
sequence.
I did learn a lot by the discussion, though. Especially Frank's
improved way of building the query strings.
Thanks all.
Jeff
Glad you've find the trick.
Remember that conceptually, in a relational database,
n-uplets (or records) are NOT known by their position ...
that's only a reminder of old -very- procedural way of thinking !
Gérard.
That makes sense because I am a very old -very- procedural kind of
guy! ;^)
Jeff
Jeff Johnson
SanDC, Inc.
(623)-582-0323
www.san-dc.com <http://www.san-dc.com>
www.cremationtracker.com <http://www.cremationtracker.com>
www.arelationshipmanager.com <http://www.arelationshipmanager.com>
_
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
multipart/related
text/html
image/jpeg
---
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
