From VFP Help!
/FSEEK( ) returns the number of bytes the file pointer is positioned from the beginning of the file. The file pointer can also be moved with FREAD( ) and FWRITE( )./ So you can't use FSEEK on a file > 2GB (?4Gb) because the return value would cause an error. iirc FREAD and FWRITE leave the file pointer at the end of the block just read/ written BUT there*/is/* a file pointer held internally which imho is going to be limited to 31/32 bits. As I said in my previous post, I think you need low-level *disk* access to break the 2Gb. otoh VFP may box clever internally - just tried this (on a 64-bit m/c if that matters):
xbig=2^63
xxbig=2^67
?xxbig/xbig          & 16.0000
xxbig = xxbig+29  & these may be
xbig = xbig+17      & lost in rounding?
?xxbig/xbig          & 16.0000


On 09/11/2013 02:55, MB Software Solutions General Account wrote:
On Thu, November 7, 2013 1:18 pm, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
Is the entire file required in memory?  A text file could be
processed sequentially a line or a buffer at a time.

No, the entire file is not required in memory at the same time.  I'm just
taking 1 line at a time, and writing the string out to a different file
based on the first 6 characters of the row.  (That's the provider number.)
  I plan to create this "splitter" program to pare down the behemouth files
into smaller ones they can process by provider.  (All provider data is
separate...no one mixed.)

So given that...I don't have to worry how big their source file is then, eh?


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to