On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Ted Roche <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Ed Leafe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 30, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Stephen Russell <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > http://visualstudiomagazine.com/articles/2013/06/01/roc-rocks.aspx
> > >
> > > Article is Why You Shouldn't Comment (or Document) Code
> >
> > Geez, I keep seeing this same tired argument, especially from the Ruby
> > crowd.
> >
>
> Indeed! One of my pet peeves with the Ruby community is the lack of
> commenting.
>
> However, quoting from the fine article: "Let's say you modify some
> application based on the comments you find in the code. You then put your
> changes into production, and discover that there was some essential
> component that the comments failed to mention. " That's asinine! You make
> code changes BASED ON THE COMMENTS? Then you put them into PRODUCTION with
> no TESTING? You get what you deserve.
> ---------------------



I have placed comments in classes that often tweaked with new enhancements.

/* State what change they want now. It may have already been done and is
just commented out below

SCR 2/13/2012  Add another parameter to pass to the sproc.


*/

-- 
Stephen Russell
Sr. Analyst
Ring Container Technology
Oakland TN

901.246-0159 cell


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cajidmyl85wek05gxhwh5erxbfvoddg1ls9cxltvg60jttfg...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to