On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Darren <[email protected]> wrote:
> I suspect the very reason MS discontinued VFP for it is way too good a > product to discard for any other reason. > -------------- You made me spit out some coffee there. VFP is too tightly bound to the OS to the piont that file size limits still exist. Another flaw in that perfect world is files are independent dbf, cdx, fpt. Any one gets corrupted the entire file is taken down. For almost 30 years of existence why do anti virus system still have to be tweaked to now get in the way of an app working? You are confusing this <http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/93/Pily_platnice.jpg> with this <<http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/93/Pily_platnice.jpg> http://www.lowes.com/images/LCI/Planning/BuyingGuides/bg_CircularSawBuyingGuide_inline.jpg > -- Stephen Russell Sr. Analyst Ring Container Technology Oakland TN 901.246-0159 cell --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYLG8BjueCh3gLDYmbV2D3sa_xey4Ft9N=J+AT=1axb...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
