On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Allen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Nor me, I didn't know it was. From what I understood is the cable was > possibly intercepted as it crossed uk soil/water and I would have guessed > it > was electronic rather than breaking into the cable. I think too much > invasion of privacy is done in the name of anti terrorism. I believe it's > used as an excuse to watch people. > Al > > Nah Al it was malware. Rather sophisticated stuff . Discovered mid august but it took until a few days ago to remove it as it had to be done in one sweep. Did far more or at least could do far more than eavesdropping. The IT people i heard were - to put it mildly - not amused. A+ jml --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBzRN7TX5s-BcYnqerj=gMmqRRKf7zHFhERO4w-D1f=+h...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
