On 5/21/2013 4:44 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Ricardo Aráoz <[email protected]> wrote:
El 21/05/13 11:32, Frank Cazabon escribió:
I've also been using it in my previous job with no problems at all.
Well, that's not entirely true. There have been some queries that did
receive a truncated answer, so you should check the quantity of tuples
received to be sure. In those cases I simply changed the query to some
other form that brought the same set or divided it into a couple of queries
and combined them within VFP. Never found out what was going on, but OTOH I
was only allowed to use VFP6 and the people maintaining the database were
not the best. So it might have something to do with database settings or
maybe is something particular to VFP6 and corrected in newer releases.
---------------
Sounds like a timeout issue as a WAG from VFP.
I have run queries that took DAYS to populate data across tens of
thousands of cancer patients over decades in time. All Data Warehouse
kind of stuff from every system that St. Jude's Children's Research
Hospital.
WTH?!?!? Wrong thread!!! Who stepped in it...? lol
--
Mike Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
President, Chief Software Architect
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
http://twitter.com/mbabcock16
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
