On 12/22/2012 07:42 AM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 12/22/2012 08:35 AM, lelandj wrote:
Only Leland will disagree :-)
The AR-15 is essentially the same M16 weapon I used in Vietnam. The
only difference is the AR-15 is semi-automatic, and the M16 is fully
automatic. The AR-15 uses Remington 223 caliber ammo, and the M16 uses
the NATO 5.56 round. The Remington 223 and NATO 5.56 are essentially
the same thing with very slight variations.
The purpose of weapons like the AR-15 and M16 is to wage war. I support
a band on ordinary citizens owning these types of military/law
enforcement grade weapons.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5.56%C3%9745mm_NATO
http://www.humanevents.com/2011/02/15/223-remington-vs-556-nato-what-you-dont-know-could-hurt-you/
Hi Leland,
See how predictable you are?
That's a good thing. Right?
A band using AR-15/16s would play monotonous music.
Whoops, I should have said ban. LOL
The difference between .223 and 5.56 NATO is not enough to produce
even two notes. OK, I guess there is some difference between semi and
full auto, but not a full interval and the magazines are only 30
rounds so the full auto is only for a few seconds and then you have to
reload.
The ammo lasts longer when fired in burst of 3 to 4 round per trigger
pull, which is the recommended method, when full auto is selected on the
M16.
A lousy band, can't imagine why you would suggest it.
Regards,
LelandJ
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
