Also - isn't there some kind of compression options that exist when
creating PDF files? Maybe the chopped up one didn't have the compression
set. OR - maybe I am way off base...
-K-
On 12/13/2012 2:35 PM, Mike Copeland wrote:
Size is usually driven by fonts being embedded...it's best to use
native fonts, i.e., Time Roman, Arial, to keep PDF files small.
If you use a font, "Matt's Grunge" then that binary data has to be
embedded in every PDF that uses the font, even if only one character
uses that typeface.
Mike
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [NF] oddball PDF file print/size issue
From: M Jarvis <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: 12/13/2012 1:31 PM
While trying to help someone get around the Outlook size limit we have
in place, I got the bright idea to chuck up the really big file into
smaller ones by printing to the CutePDF driver... in this case, take
the 70 page original, open in Reader and do pages 1-25, 26-50,
51-70...
My assumption was that the pieces would be more or less 1/3 the size
of the original, but as it turns out they are nearly as big, and in
some cases BIGGER, than the original.
I tried fooling around with some print options in Adobe but nothing
seemed to do the trick...
This makes no sense....
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
