On 06/22/2012 03:21 AM, Alan Bourke wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012, at 04:44 PM, Leland Jackson wrote: >> http://www.w3schools.com/html5/default.asp >> > Although after reading this I'd take anything on w3Schools with a pinch > of salt:http://w3fools.com/ >
Excerpt from page 4 of the article: #----------------------------------- When I first looked into learning HTML5, this was the first site I found useful for playing around easily with the actual HTML5 syntax. My attitude is not shared by everyone. There is another site called W3Fools.com <http://www.w3fools.com> that asserts that the W3Schools site is not only unaffiliated with any real authority such as W3C, but also that the site provides damaging, wrong information. I have no idea if the first claim is actually correct, and for my purposes it did not matter at all. When I reviewed their claims, the data that is cited as incorrect is in the details, deep down. Examples include simplifications and errors about which features are supported by specific browsers. #----------------------------------- There has been a lot of politics and competing agendas surrounding moving HTML5 forward, so this kind of thing is to be expected. Regards, LelandJ --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
