On 4/25/2012 4:06 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: >> InnoDB is for transactions, which you're not doing. It's slower on >> reads and writes than MyISAM, but don't go changing it until we learn >> some more.
I know I had some production issues with one of my MBSS clients a few years ago where the fix was to change to InnoDB instead of MyISAM, and I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that the speed difference between the two was negligible so I opted for reliability. There was logic used in my deciding to use the InnoDB engine...albeit from a few years old logic. -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief Software Architect http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com http://twitter.com/mbabcock16 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
