And 43.5 mpg from the short wheel base.... http://www.ford.co.uk/Commercialvehicles/Transit/Models-and-Prices/tabid=tab4
To be fair though we have the standard 150BHP version in our land rover and it gets 30mpg over average road conditions but half that over rough terain.... -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pete Theisen Sent: 25 April 2012 10:34 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] New Ford Vans? Adam Buckland wrote: > 39.8 mpg for the ECOnetic version.... things have moved on since yours > Pete.... Hi Adam, Really? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECOnetic Somehow, I don't see any van models . . . > 25% More fuel efficient? They will get 13 MPG instead of the 10 mine got? > > http://wot.motortrend.com/not-for-us-ford-transit-custom-cargo-van-launching-in-europe-194279.html -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
