On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Lew Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just as a matter for curiosity, has anyone fooled around with RUBY as
> a second language? Can you offer any comments as to ease & scope of
> use vs Python (for example)?

About 2-3 years of delivering apps in Ruby.

What Ed said :)

Ruby and Rails have a very brief syntax, where a lot of powerful
functionality can be expressed in a very curt statement. It's a
somewhat different mindset than FoxPro or Python, which I think of as
far more 'literate' programming, where we write our sagas.

Like Python there are a lot of smart people creating really powerful
extensions to the language and its frameworks. Either one of them is a
good choice for a primary web development language.

Far more important than the technical aspects of the languages are:

- whether or not it "speaks" to you - try it, you'll like it! - or not.
- whether you can find a good support network - locally or virtually
- whether you have the buy-in of the people who pay the bills - some
of the worst disasters I've seen have been clients who thrashed from
Perl to PHP to Python to Ruby to Erlang to Haskell - languages may
develop in Internet time, but it still takes programmers time to learn
and go from novice to learner to journeyman to master, and - nine
women can't have a baby in one month - this takes time. Far more time
than most of us admit.

-- 
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cacw6n4uqk7orkmxkfrjpufympb16hggvgfa4j5irjomdydd...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to