> > If I use the line > > run /n N:\MAILSEND\mailsend1.16 -v -smtp plus.smtp.mail.yahoo.com -port > 587 -t > [email protected] -f > [email protected] -sub "this is a test" -M "this is the body" -auth -user > [email protected] -pass "password." > > It fails with the Run/! command failed
The EXE name isn't following the 8.3 rule. While technically COMMAND.COMdoes support long file names to some degree, the back and forth between 16 bit and 32 bit layer isn't very stable in my experience. We're are using a batch file and execute it with CMD.EXE /C whatever.BAT (START.EXE on Windows 9x). Over the past decade that has been the most reliable solution for us in FPD. In FPW I'd probably use RegFn and CallFn to call CreateProcess directly. Rick Strahl had great articles on using 32-bit API functions from FPW 2.x, even though he might not recall writing those <g> http://portal.dfpug.de/dFPUG/Dokumente/FoxTalk/FoxTalk1996/FT19962_1.PDF http://portal.dfpug.de/dFPUG/Dokumente/Online/Call32.doc Christof --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAL4QJhgZ8CU-3A=g3nudhPSPomw+k+nQ4hLCZddid9ieB=9...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
