Ed Leafe wrote: > On Mar 29, 2012, at 10:19 PM, John Harvey wrote: > >> A new video shows officers escorting him into the police station in >> handcuffs. I believe he was about to undergo, As the Supremes like to say, >> "custodial interrogation." > > Note the timestamp is less than an hour after he claimed that he had > his head repeatedly smashed into the concrete and suffered repeated blows by > his "assailant". As an officer of the law, would you find any irregularities > with that timeline?
Hi Ed, Like I keep trying to tell you, it isn't the same guy in the video. If it were he would have hair. If he had a broken nose, you wouldn't necessarily see that in a video of such low resolution, or even in the still if he had washed the blood off of his face. Similarly, hair as thick of his would hide scalp wounds, even if he had been stitched which has not been claimed for this case. The left will cling to the "he wasn't attacked by Martin" story no matter what, however. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
