Rabble Rouser, nothing more.   An empty, soulless suit. 

________________________________
 From: "Michael Oke, II" <[email protected]>
To: ProFox Email List <[email protected]> 
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 7:22 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand
 
Sorry but no.  There are far worse examples that resided at the same address. 
And the only people that find Obama to be such a wonderful orator are those 
that are enthralled with everything that he does regardless of it actual value. 

Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221

Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient. 

On Mar 18, 2012, at 4:09 PM, "geoff" <[email protected]> wrote:

> the point is that all things being equal... (and they are) Obama is a superb
> orator and GWB was so bad, he is now the STANDARD in bad. both had
> teleprompters, both had other people write their speeches.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of Ricardo Araoz
> Sent: Monday, 19 March 2012 9:12 AM
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand
> 
> El 18/03/12 19:04, Michael Madigan escribió:
>> Obama's greatest speeches were written by someone else.  
>> 
>> He book, "Dreams of My Father", was written by someone else.  
>> 
>> He's a fraud. 
>> 
>> 
>> ________________________________
>> From: Ricardo Araoz <[email protected]>
>> To: ProFox Email List <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 6:00 PM
>> Subject: Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand
>> 
>> El 18/03/12 02:20, Michael Oke, II escribió:
>>> Sorry, not a great orator. He can read decently but take the TelePrompTer
> away from him and he is far below average.  When the great speakers are
> counted, his name won't be on the list. 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Michael Oke, II
>>> 661-349-6221
>> Does this mean GWB was that bad EVEN with a TelePrompter?
>> 
>> Un B Fucking Lievable!!!
> 
> Is it me?
> Are you *actually* answering my post? Or do you just go on with your rant
> regardless?
> 
> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to