Michael Madigan wrote: > Call me when they start programming this one. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbFFs4DHWys
Hi Michael, That may be more of a humanoid than a robot. Not much need for such a thing, really. Ugly machines cost less and do more work. The significance of robots is that they do the work of humans, making more leisure possible for humans. Problem will be in getting away from the work model for distributing the goods of society. When there is little or no work, but plenty of goods - how do you distribute the goods? The most to the biggest assholes? >>> So you want to develop SW for robots? >>> >>> <http://www.aldebaran-robotics.com/en/Solutions/For-Development/developer-program.html> >> PyCon opened up this morning with a dance exhibition of those robots, >> choreographed entirely in Python. I'm uploading a short clip I took right >> now, so if the video isn't available right away, try again later: >> http://youtu.be/M74EZcOPogg > Cool. Nice that you thought to film it. Thanks. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
