Ed Leafe wrote: > If you want to post rants, or spew vitriol, or sermonize others from > your position of moral superiority, then fine, be my guest. But please don't > pretend for a minute that you are engaging in a *discussion*. > > https://plus.google.com/115858612877723984178/posts/2jUgjKjR4Ac > > It's sort of like driving: if you want to do whatever the hell makes > you feel good, go right ahead, but don't do it on roads that are shared with > others. Find a big empty field where you can drive as recklessly as you like > without damaging others. But if you want to drive on roads that others use, > you need to agree to abide by some basic rules so that everyone can get where > they want to go. The above link explains those rules for those of you who > apparently have never learned them.
Hi Ed, Matters of faith can not meet the criteria set forth here for "rational exchange'. Therefore there is a good chance that the person making this set of rules BELIEVES that faith is not rational. And who is this authority? Fan Tai? Who is Fan Tai, and is he/she the same Fan Tai as all the other Fan Tais? -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
