On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Pete Theisen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Stephen Russell wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Pete Theisen <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>
>>> Don't these accusers have names and contact information? What ever
>>> happened to an accused's right to face an accuser?
>
>> Didn't his insurance company already pay those women?  I am pretty
>> sure he knows who they are, first hand.
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> There is a confidentiality agreement. He can't say, they shouldn't have
> said. Perhaps they didn't say anything and the whole thing is the work
> of hostile aggressors.
>
> Depending on the wording of it - they have him in a box. If he says
> anything he has breached it - they, being "female victims" (who may not
> even exist) can carp away all they want in the shadows.
>
> If they exist, if they were paid, it was on the condition of silence -
> and probably with no admission of wrongdoing.
-----------------------

On the local tea party station I just heard the DJs say that the
latest Cain story is women claim that he is their babies daddy.

Wonder if we will see bumper stickers "More women than Kennedy."


-- 
Stephen Russell

901.246-0159 cell

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMY+i2Q1y2RXA9cjDhjsY0j8xfPD=91fb238o1rvsij-...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to