If I looked around in my stuff - I think I could dredge up the FoxPro
for DOS pre-release 0.99 version install floppy disks. I was at the Fox
Conference where they unveiled FP for DOS - and I thought it was so cool
when the Pres. of Fox SW demoed opening up a TON of programs on the
screen by typing:
     Modi Comm *.prg

The crowd went WILD in the room.

Those were some fun times indeed.

Ah - yes - the Memories...

-K-

-----Original Message-----
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com]
On Behalf Of Ed Leafe
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 9:45 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Ah memories ...

On Sep 30, 2011, at 7:53 AM, Alan Bourke wrote:

> Moving office soon and going through a period of hardcore throwing
> things out at the minute. Have the following Fox related items:
> 
> Foxpro for DOS 2.60 Standard
> Foxpro for Windows 2.60 Standard
> Visual Foxpro For Windows 3.0 (on floppy)
> Foxpro For DOS Distribution Kit 2.5
> Foxpro For Windows Distribution Kit 2.5
> Visual Foxpro 7 Professional Upgrade Edition
> Visual Foxpro 5 Professional
> Visual Foxpro 6.0 Professional Upgrade
> 
> Quite a bit of history there!

        I have one of the rarest Fox items: a CD of VFP 4!

        The release after 3.0 was naturally going to be 4.0, and the
first beta was marked as such. Then the decision to move to VS was made,
and the numbering was changed to 5.0 to match other VS products.



-- Ed Leafe

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/289ea162f5642645b5cf64d624c66a140b7ce...@us-ny-mail-002.waitex.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to