Hello Alan,

Yes, all the EXE's are the same.

I do that for sending emails. I add the emails to a queue and another
program reads the que and sends the emails.

I can't do that for this part of the job because I can get many transactions
coming in at the same time and have to process them and return the answer as
fast as possible. Since VFP is not multi-threaded, the only way I could get
this to work is have a VB program sit in front of the VFP programs and act
as a traffic cop.

This setup is working great and as the client grows, he can add more
computers to split the load. Currently we have 3 computers running a VB
traffic cop and about 5 to 20 VFP programs on each one.

Even better news, we have had an no 1104 errors since last Friday when we
turned on our mini-close routine.

Keeping my fingers crossed,
Kent

-----Original Message-----
From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf
Of Alan Bourke
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:42 AM
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Error 1104



On Friday, September 02, 2011 4:33 PM, "Kent Belan" <kbe...@mchsi.com>
wrote:
> 
> program that receives requests from a TCP/IP socket and then passes 
> the request to one of many VFP EXE's waiting for a transaction.

Are all these EXEs identical? If so why not have one EXE and have your VB
side append requests to a queue, and the VFP side pop items off it and
process them ?
--
  Alan Bourke
  alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/286924A2F2DC4DB285C18E4679858FC2@LaptopW7
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to