John Harvey wrote:
> I'm sorry to hear of your problems. I guess I just think you should not give
> up and accept status quo, without trying to find something else. 

Hi John,

When you have $63 a week should you spend *any* of it looking for a job 
when all you get when you do look is rejection? Yeah, maybe . . .

>> Yep, what was I thinking. The job you have HAS to be THE ONLY JOB in 
>> the world that you can qualify for. HELLO?

> OK, by "somewhat imperfect" I mean I am quite ill and may have to quit even
> if I can't afford it. Diabetes and related stuff.
> 
> Now do you understand? Maybe not. Lots of people like to think that no one
> who needs money is handicapped. We are almost used to the attitude.
> 
>>> Sounds like you need a job change.
> 
>> Another brilliant thought. They are hiring a few 20 year olds who are 
>> perfect physical specimens but I am 66 1/2 and somewhat imperfect.
>>
>> You guys are batting a thousand today!
>>
>>>> You're not forced to work there, however.
>>> Brilliant thought. I could quit and not work at all. Then instead of 
>>> being $100 a month short of my budget I would be $350 a month short.
>>>
>>> Well, not quite - have to figure the cost of the light bulbs. Toilet 
>>> paper I would use at home. Light bulbs, I have florescent fixtures.
>>>
>>> Yeah, capitalism. Best thing since communism. Both in the same bed.
>>>
>>> This with 27 years of formal education and 58 years working one job 
>>> or another. Boy, was I sold a Brooklyn Bridge.
>>>
>>>>>> When government interferes with capitalism by
--
Regards,

Pete
http://pete-theisen.com/
http://elect-pete-theisen.com/

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to