It is the combination of weblocks and "views" (with views i mean just a query with joins, groupings etc) that is the problem. I suspect that weblocks thinks any object has a one to one relation to a table and thus treats it like that. However I could be wrong I still need to do some more testing to see what weblocks' behaviour/expectations are exactly. Once I have done that I will come back to you with more specifics.
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 10:58 +0100, Marijn Haverbeke wrote: > Can you be more specific about the problems that come up with views? > In the past, I've just used regular DAO classes on views, and never > updated or inserted them. > > _______________________________________________ > postmodern-devel mailing list > postmodern-devel@common-lisp.net > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postmodern-devel _______________________________________________ postmodern-devel mailing list postmodern-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postmodern-devel
