* natan via Postfix-users <na...@epf.pl>: > Hi > Today uceprotect add class /24 to blaclist ... One user (dedicated server) > send probably spam but the user claims that he did not send spam only 6 > e-mails in 1h. And uceprotect was blocked by the whole class ... > > other RBLs it was clean any IP with that class /24
What you describe is what UCEprotect is known for. At eco e.V. in Germany, we at the competence group "E-Mail", published a paper about choosing and using blocklists. In this document UCEprotect serves as the only negative example of a blocklist service for all the reasons you stated yourself. Besides that UCEprotect has ridiculed people with complaints and for their misogynistic behaviour. But… there's nothing you can do about it and, dunno if you do that, you shouldn't take it personally when one of your servers gets listed by UCEprotect. It's their customers who choose a blocklist provider that acts with such quality and they don't seem to mind if their receivability is influenced by UCEprotect's blocklist quality. > Any idea ? I'm not going to pay the clowns I agree. I wouldn't pay them either. If you need to communicate with customers using UCEprotect blocklists and can't send them an email use a phone and let them know eventually you can't use email because … p@rick -- [*] sys4 AG https://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64 Schleißheimer Straße 26/MG,80333 München Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263 Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Marc Schiffbauer, Wolfgang Stief Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
