Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 04:37:41AM +0000, Sean Hennessey wrote:
>
> > I want to thank you a million for this. I finally read up on the docs
> > and got this working. I'm still going to do some more in depth
> > testing, but my quick little testing seems to be doing exactly what I
> > wanted.
>
> Good luck. You should generally follow the advice to prefix *SQL and
> LDAP table definitions with "proxy:", so that database connections are
> shared among multiple processes.
>
> This use case could perhaps be added as a worked-out example in
> PGSQL_README (in the spirit of the examples in LDAP_README).
>
> If you feel up to writing it up after working out the kinks, you could
> perhaps draft a patch to the "proto/PGSQL_README" source file.
I think this solves a general (advanced) problem, and belongs in a
more general configuration readme (the PGSQL part can be implemented
via other means). I already have a collection with a handful of
advanced use cases.
That said, I'll accept a plantext description, no need for patches.
Wietse
