> On Feb 5, 2018, at 4:28 PM, Niclas Rautenhaus
> <rautenh...@team-datentechnik.de> wrote:
>
>> One thing that is interesting is that the message generates two BCC
>> copies with the *same* recipient address:
>
> This is *only* the case with mails that later get deferred. Messages that are
> sucessfully sent to the appliance that archives the mails are only logged
> once, with the status "sent" obviously.
> The recipients address in this and all other cases is always the appliances
> address (maildepot@mailappliance.local) . The "real" recipients never appear
> as a duplicate.
You elided the log entries that show that the message to the archive had
two identical recipients in the same delivery attempt. It is difficult to
discuss this if you trim the data under discussion.
With "always_bcc", and without "receive_override_options=no_address_mappings"
the bcc processing happens twice, once on either side of the content_filter.
An original message with a single recipient then ends up having three
recipients,
one the original recipient, and two that are the BCC address. This is what your
logs show.
My question is whether the delivery failures are also observed when there's only
one BCC recipient. Despite whatever perceptions you may have of my tone, which
is a consequence of limited time, not disrespect, please take the time to read
my
posts *carefully*, and follow the suggestions posting the requested results.
--
Viktor.
