On 19.08.2015, at 20:02, Viktor Dukhovni <postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 07:49:42PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote:

>> One of the servers in question is one of the servers sending mail for this 
>> ML:
>> 
>> Aug 19 19:08:29 <mail.info> mail postfix/smtpd[94303]: connect from 
>> russian-caravan.cloud9.net[2604:8d00:0:1::4]
>> Aug 19 19:08:29 <mail.info> mail postfix/smtpd[94303]: SSL_accept error from 
>> russian-caravan.cloud9.net[2604:8d00:0:1::4]: lost connection
> 
> Works for me via IPv6 too:
> 
>    $ posttls-finger -o inet_protocols=ipv6 -c -p TLSv1 -lmay -Lsummary \
>       -o "tls_medium_cipherlist=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA" \
>       odo.in-berlin.de
>    posttls-finger: Untrusted TLS connection established to 
> mx1.enfer-du-nord.net[2001:41d0:8:67d4:1:1:0:1]:25: TLSv1 with cipher 
> DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)

Just in case I couldn't make it clear: All sending servers from cloud9.net 
deliver mail via IPv4 or IPv6 to my servers without any issue and without 
entries in smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps. The *only exception* is 
russian-caravan.cloud9.net[2604:8d00:0:1::4].

> To debug further, we'd need a tcpdump full packet capture:
> 
>    http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#sniffer
[…]
>> I will revert back to OpenSLL. If you won't to investigate LibreSSL's
>> behavior with regard to russian-caravan.cloud9.net any further, I am
>> willing to keep my secondary mx to LibreSSL for the time being. If not,
>> please let me know. Might have been too early for that switch to LibreSSL
> 
> I would not go out of my way to switch to LibreSSL at this time.
> Use it if you're using OpenBSD, but stick with OpenSSL for now on
> other platforms.

Understood. 

> That said, it might be helpful to others to find out what
> interoperability problem was introduced by LibreSSL 2.2.2.
> 
> So get a packet capture or two before reverting to OpenSSL.

I will revert to OpenSSL my primary mx, first. Then I will come back to this 
issue and provide you with tcpdump debugging info. Might take some days, 
though. Should I send them off-list or on-list?

Thanks again and with kind regards,
Michael

Reply via email to