On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 02:04:25PM +0100, A. Schulze wrote:
> >>This is draft -08. Is that followed by AUTH48?
> >
> >The -08 version was approved by IESG, and is now in the RFC editor
> >queue.
>
> Viktor,
>
> In the meantime there is a version 10 available which changes the 521 reply
> to "556 whatever". Do you have more news?
No, I've not been tracking this lately.
> I stumbled about null MX again because I would like to setup some domains
> with "MX 0 ." but postfix ( 2.11 and 2.12 ) still reply with "Malformed DNS
> reply"
This is up to Wietse, he's been the last one to update the code in
question, so I think he has first call on how to proceed.
> How do you see the probability the draft will be an RFC till postfix-2.12
> (Q1/2015) and postfix could handle that correct?
I'll leave that question to Wietse. My take is that we should
recognize "IN MX 0 ." as a permanent "mail not accepted" indication.
--
Viktor.
