On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 01:49:19PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_delivery_status_filter
> >
> > Yes, this "works", but it is very much not recommended. When
> > receiving systems botch their certificate chains (expired, incomplete
> > chain, ...) and mail is delayed, they should generally be motivated
> > to fix the problem quickly.
>
> I agree that screwing up with certificates is easy enough, but this
> is a case where the MX server does not announce STARTTLS support.
For the record, I am not disagreeing with your response, just trying
to encourage the OP to consider alternatives. Even a missing
STARTTLS can be a transient operational error.
--
Viktor.
