Viktor Dukhovni:
> > Sorry, it must be the same interface as access tables. Special
> > cases are taboo.
>
> I'm not fond of lossful mangling of the input, especially if policy
> services are liable to get it wrong. Perhaps this idea needs to
> wait until the Postfix dictionary layer understands multiple results,
> returning a list rather than a concatenation. At that point,
> suitable variants of pcre/regexp or directives at the top of the
> file can turn on list splitting of the RHS prior to sub-pattern
> replacement.
Postfix has a simple string interface for its key-value store. I
have an aversion against changing that into some binary protocol
with sub-record structure. Similar to my aversion against systemd
logging, among other things.
Wietse
