*argh*

"regexp" versus "pcre"
i only replaced the regex without realite the different map type

that's why i posted "postconf -n" :-(

however, works now, thank you!

Am 17.09.2014 um 01:59 schrieb li...@rhsoft.net:
> Am 17.09.2014 um 01:42 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 01:24:27AM +0200, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>>
>>> I still don't understand why "postmap" has a result but with
>>> postfix Viktors rule don't catch the attachment and so finally
>>> my one from the initial posting two lines below triggers
>>
>> The live configuration must differ from the test configuration, or
>> your test is flawed.
> 
> you may not believe it but
> 
> there is no live / test - just one configuration
> 
> the "test" is just send a mail with Thunderbird and a example attachment,
> in the case below a zerobyte file named "test.exe.txt.sh", added to a new
> message with subject and body test
> 
>> Compare mail logs with command-line output.  If not the same,
>> something in your configuration is causing a different set of rules
>> to be used.  Perhaps you've multiple cleanup instances (different
>> cleanup for submission)
> 
> for sure not - there is no submission - just Port 25 and the
> config file is used because it reflects comment out rules
> and do the same test after reload postfix
> 
> that was the reason to add (Rule XX) to the reject message
> ______________________________________________________
> 
> that is the log:
> 
> Sep 17 01:53:57 mail-gw postfix/cleanup[28448]: 3hyLr521BVz1l: reject: header 
> Content-Type:
> application/x-shellscript;? name="test.exe.txt.sh" from ******; 
> from=<h.rei...@test.thelounge.net> to=<****>
> proto=ESMTP helo=<srv-rhsoft.rhsoft.net>: 5.7.1 554 Attachment Blocked (Rule 
> 4)
> ______________________________________________________
> 
> that is the content of the config - the config is used 100% for sure
> because befor the hitting rule had (Rule 3) and yours was on top with
> (Rule 0) now renumbered tu (Rule 1)
> 
> [root@mail-gw:~]$ cat postfix/mime_header_checks.cf
> # Reject Attachment Extensions
> 
> /^Content-(?:Disposition|Type):(?:.*?;)? \s*(?:file)?name \s* =
> \s*"?(.*?(\.|=2E)(386|acm|ade|adp|awx|ax|bas|bat|bin|cdf|chm|cmd|cnv|com|cpl|crt|csh|dll|dlo|drv|exe|hlp|hta|inf|ins|isp|jse|lnk|mdb|mde|mdt|mdw|msc|msi|msp|mst|nws|ocx|ops|pcd|pif|pl|prf|reg|scf|scr|script|sct|sh|shb|shm|shs|so|sys|tlb|vb|vbe|vbs|vbx|vxd|wiz|wll|wpc|wsc|wsf|wsh))(?:\?=)?"?\s*(;|$)/x
> REJECT 554 Attachment Blocked (Rule 1)
> 
> /^\s*Content-(Disposition|Type).*name\s*=\s*"?(.*(\.|=2E)(386|acm|ade|adp|awx|ax|bas|bat|bin|cdf|chm|cmd|cnv|com|cpl|crt|csh|dll|dlo|drv|exe|hlp|hta|inf|ins|isp|jse|lnk|mdb|mde|mdt|mdw|msc|msi|msp|mst|nws|ocx|ops|pcd|pif|pl|prf|reg|scf|scr|script|sct|sh|shb|shm|shs|so|sys|tlb|vb|vbe|vbs|vbx|vxd|wiz|wll|wpc|wsc|wsf|wsh))(\?=)?"?\s*$/x
> REJECT 554 Attachment Blocked (Rule 2)
> 
> /^\s*Content-(?:Disposition|Type):(?:.*?;)?\s*(?:file)?name\s*=\s*"?(.*?(\.|=2E)(386|acm|ade|adp|awx|ax|bas|bat|bin|cdf|chm|cmd|cnv|com|cpl|crt|csh|dll|dlo|drv|exe|hlp|hta|inf|ins|isp|jse|lnk|mdb|mde|mdt|mdw|msc|msi|msp|mst|nws|ocx|ops|pcd|pif|pl|prf|reg|scf|scr|script|sct|sh|shb|shm|shs|so|sys|tlb|vb|vbe|vbs|vbx|vxd|wiz|wll|wpc|wsc|wsf|wsh))(?:\?=)?"?\s*(;|$)/x
>  REJECT 554 Attachment Blocked (Rule 3)
> 
> /name=[^>]*\.(386|acm|ade|adp|awx|ax|bas|bat|bin|cdf|chm|cmd|cnv|com|cpl|crt|csh|dll|dlo|drv|exe|hlp|hta|inf|ins|isp|jse|lnk|mdb|mde|mdt|mdw|msc|msi|msp|mst|nws|ocx|ops|pcd|pif|pl|prf|reg|scf|scr|script|sct|sh|shb|shm|shs|so|sys|tlb|vb|vbe|vbs|vbx|vxd|wiz|wll|wpc|wsc|wsf|wsh)\"/
> REJECT 554 Attachment Blocked (Rule 4)

Reply via email to