> Yes. I'm working on preforking (in fact, I've started to analyze
> prefork.c from Apache web server some days ago...). Threads are an
> option, but we choose forking for better isolation. Some people say
> forking and threading is basically the same in term of perfs, that's
> even written in some books dedicated to linux programming, some others
> have another opinion.

Good. I'd agree that the difference in performance between a preforking
and a multithreaded approach will not be that big. A multithreaded model
requires less memory. But with the (hopefully) small footprint of
greylisting code this should be neglectable.

>>
>> So, where is your code? Did I miss a link?
>>
> Well, I've decided to not put links any more on a mailing list
> dedicated to postfix (this is in link with what you wrote in your
> first sentence...), and my posts here are very rare. If people want to
> take a look at this very young project module, they can find it by
> themselves on sourceforge (or by checking my very first posts to this
> postfix mailing list)

I should have added that all I said was only IMO, of course. It is not
up to me to decide what does belong here and what does not. I am happy
about anyone offering time and efforts to develop free software or to
share something valuable with the community.

Reply via email to