[email protected] (Wietse Venema) wrote:
> fletch:
> > The postfix performance claims made via this thread are far-fetched to
say
> > the least. Most postfix users will only see outbound throughput in the
> > range of ~250,000/hour per instance in a production setting. Yet,
people on
> > here are claiming 10 million/hour? I guess that would be possible if a
> > sender were to run, say, 40 postfix instances which would be a complete
> > management nightmare of course.
> >
> > Obviously, vendors like Port25 (company behind PowerMTA) and GreenArrow
> > would not be able to make any sales if the benefits of commercial
software
> > products v. open source were not substantial.
>
> Is this a troll?
Obviously YES.
And quite a lot of feeders too.
> I have documented Postfix performance claims on Wikipedia. Be sure
> to read the cautionary note about factors outside of Postfix that
> in practice limit the delivery performance.
>
> Wietse
>
>
DFTT
--
Roel Wagenaar,
Linux-User #469851 with the Linux Counter; http://linuxcounter.net/
Antw.: Omdat het de volgorde verstoord waarin mensen tekst lezen.
Vraag: Waarom is top-posting een slechte gewoonte?
Antw.: Top-posting.
Vraag: Wat is het meest ergerlijke in e-mail?
Diplomacy is the art of letting someone else get your way.
