May be we can put that into the Postfix documentation page, in "Specific environments" section. Also, may be DNS can be there, both are "environments" anyway...
Just 2 cents... Best regards, --- Fernando Maciel Souto Maior On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:17 PM, /dev/rob0 <r...@gmx.co.uk> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 04:59:37PM +0000, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > I see negligible benefit from an SNI implementation for Postfix. > > > > Is it time to add an anti-SNI rationale section to TLS_README? This > > would set a bad precedent, there is no limit to the number of > > non-features we could document. > > Rather than putting it in TLS_README, I think a FAQ would be more > fitting. I know we used to have a FAQ document, but it has long ago > been abandoned. We get a lot of the same questions here, and some > ardent Googlers still stumble upon the old faq.html page. > > Perhaps rather than a DNS_README as you suggested in another thread, > that could be worked into a FAQ? I agree, DNS is a vital subject to > most MTA administrators, but here too it's not going to cover actual > Postfix features, for the most part. > -- > http://rob0.nodns4.us/ -- system administration and consulting > Offlist GMX mail is seen only if "/dev/rob0" is in the Subject: >
