Sat, 09 Feb 2013 10:25:31 -0600 skrev Noel Jones
<njo...@megan.vbhcs.org>:

...
 
> Nothing wrong with this setup.  It's very easy to configure,
> requires no third-party software or additional packages, and it's
> easy to understand where your mail goes.  I expect that's why it's
> used as an example on the spamassassin wiki, and doesn't necessarily
> mean it's the recommended or preferred method.
> 
> It's not necessarily the highest performance or the most flexible,
> but if it suits your needs, no need to change.
> 
> Folks who need more usually pick some third-party filtering software
> that can run pre-queue as an smtpd_proxy_filter or milter. These
> are, without exception, more complicated than the setup you
> currently have.  The big advantage of a pre-queue filter is you can
> safely REJECT unwanted mail.
> 
> Amavisd-new is a popular choice for pre-queue filtering since it's
> fast, reliable, flexible, and can integrate both SpamAssassin and
> antivirus.
> 
> 
>   -- Noel Jones

Sorry for the late response, it took some time to dig through all the
information. The use of pre-queue filtering would solve another problem
I've been working on: What to do with mail from (user)blacklisted
senders.

I plan on upgrading Debians stable Postfix to the current stable
version of 2.10 so I may benefit from postscreen, and that will
probably be a good time to install amavisd-new as a pre-queue filter.

Thank you for the help once again.

Reply via email to