--On Wednesday, January 09, 2013 12:50 PM -0600 Noel Jones
<njo...@megan.vbhcs.org> wrote:
On 1/9/2013 12:26 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Tuesday, January 08, 2013 3:38 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
<qua...@zimbra.com> wrote:
Should I have RBLs in smtpd_relay_restrictions instead? Or should
I have
moved permit_sasl_authenticated into
smtpd_recipient_restrictions? Or
something else entirely?
Thanks Noel and Patrick for the responses. I accidentally deleted
them when removing the thread on destination_rate_delay, but grabbed
them from the archives.
For port 465, should I do the same thing as with the submission
port, i.e., clear out permit_{client, helo, sender, recipient,
relay, data, end_of_data}_restrictions as necessary?
--Quanah
Submission and "smtps" perform essentially the same function, and
should get identical settings, with the obvious addition of tls
wrappermode for smtps.
Perfect, thank you very much!
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
