I read the links and tried some configuration modifications with
soft_bounce and internal_mail_filter_classes parameters but the
notification is still sent to sender. I need to intercept this message
in order to modify one parameter value before sending it.

Le vendredi 01 juin 2012 à 15:09 +0200, Wael MANAI a écrit :

> Thank you Jona, i am gona see your links
> 
> Le vendredi 01 juin 2012 à 11:50 +0200, DTNX Postmaster a écrit : 
> 
> > On Jun 1, 2012, at 09:49, Wael MANAI wrote:
> > 
> > > Well, I use postfix for MMS sending (MM4 protocol which is based on 
> > > SMTP). I am working on a hub system i.e I received MMS from one GSM 
> > > operator, I do some adaptations and I forward the MMS to the destination. 
> > > Sometimes for example the recipient may be rejected by the remote mailer 
> > > so I need to intercept this mailer daemon (done) in order to modify some 
> > > MM4 parameters then send it to the origin. The problem is the recipient 
> > > of the mailer daemon receives 2 mails: one correct sent by my 
> > > application, another incorrect sent by postfix. So I want to block the 
> > > mail sent by postfix.
> > 
> > Hmm, not familiar with MM4, but have you looked at the various bounce 
> > related configuration options that Postfix provides?
> > 
> > This is where I would start looking;
> > 
> > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#bounce_service_name
> > http://www.postfix.org/bounce.8.html
> > 
> > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#bounce_template_file
> > http://www.postfix.org/bounce.5.html
> > 
> > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#internal_mail_filter_classes
> > 
> > And what Ram suggested;
> > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#soft_bounce
> > 
> > Perhaps it's possible to use a custom bounce service, a custom bounce 
> > template, or something similar, and have Postfix generate the format 
> > you need?
> > 
> > Cya,
> > Jona
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > > Le vendredi 01 juin 2012 à 13:13 +0530, Ram a écrit :
> > >> You can enable soft bounce.  So NDR mails will be pending in the queue 
> > >> But I am not sure really want to do this.
> > >> Why should you not notify senders of delivery failures ? What is the 
> > >> real problem you want to solve ? 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> On 06/01/2012 12:36 PM, Wael MANAI wrote: 
> > >>> Any idea?
> > >>> 
> > >>> Le jeudi 31 mai 2012 à 17:49 +0200, Wael MANAI a écrit :
> > >>>> Hi everybody,
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> I would like to know if it's possible to prevent postfix to NOT send a 
> > >>>> MAILER DAEMON email back to the sender if something is wrong?
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> thanks in advance,
> > 

Reply via email to