Willy Tarreau:
> I'm totally in sync with you on this. On the one hand, if it is as
> trivial to make smtpd parse the PROXY line as it was for postscreen,
> it can solve the problem by having postscreen not consume the first
> line, which makes sense in that postscreen remains the first layer
> analyser which doesn't mangle data on the connection. But I can also
> understand that you're not necessarily interested in supporting a new
> method of passing connection information.
Sorry, that might work for haproxy, but could complicate attempts
to add support for other protocols. If the proxy talks to postscreen
then that is where its protocol will terminate.
Wietse
