On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:44:00AM -0500, I wrote: > I have reviewed this with more lucidity and alertness, but I have > not found any mistake. It seems that the built-in rejection of > unknown users is bound only by the global soft_bounce and these > per-class settings, to wit: > > unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550 > unknown_relay_recipient_reject_code = 550 > unknown_virtual_alias_reject_code = 550 > unknown_virtual_mailbox_reject_code = 550 > > Therefore a *possible* hack (if relay_domains is not otherwise in > use) would be for the OP to put that domain in relay_domains, take it > out of the prior address class (virtual_whichever_domains), and set > an appropriate value for relay_recipient_maps and relay_transport.
Apparently I wasn't lucid enough to include the most important part of this hack: unknown_relay_recipient_reject_code = 450 > That's an ugly hack, because it disables the use of relay_domains as > designed, but it would work for sites which don't need relay_domains. > This hack could be amended to coexist with real relay_domains, but > quite a few variables make it impractical to outline the various > possibilities. -- http://rob0.nodns4.us/ -- system administration and consulting Offlist GMX mail is seen only if "/dev/rob0" is in the Subject:
