dchil...@bestmail.us:
> Hi Wietse,
>
> On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 14:07 -0400, "Wietse Venema" <wie...@porcupine.org>
> wrote:
> > I find that Postfix documentation can always be improved. Despite
> > a lot of review there are still inaccuracies and omissions.
> ...
> > Indeed. The current documentation focuses on the basics: being
> > precise (no errors or omissions). It's like an illustrated
> > encyclopedia. This does not help people who don't know what they
> > are looking for, or what solutions may exist for a problem that
> > may not be well understood.
>
> Well stated. My challenge is likely self-imposed. I'm trying to
> implement/deploy Postfix as a
> "(my) real-world solution" that's a replacement for very functional,
> though still limited and somewhat opaque, solutions such Zimbra &
> CommuniGate. For me it is NOT an issue of free vs not; rather one of
> fully capable & flexible ... or not.
>
> To your point, I *do* know what capabilities I'm looking for. Simply
> not in the context of Postfix, or more precisely, within the context of
> its documentation.
>
> Yet.
I have a suggestion. If you're not familiar with Postfix, don't
try to use all the bells and whistles the first time. Use the
basic features first, and add advanced features over time as
you become more familiar with the system.
Wietse
