Am Freitag, den 11.09.2009, 16:10 +0200 schrieb Mikael Bak: > Mathias Tausig wrote: > > I just tried to replace the "\n" with "\r\l", but to no avail. The same > > problem remains. > > I can be wrong here, but shouldn't that be "\r\n" ? > > HTH, > Mikael
You are right, of course. I had \r\n before, with the same negative results, and just tried the other variation in desperation. cheers Mathias
