On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 12:56:33PM -0600, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> Massive confusion, and looking back on the thread somewhat, I still
> think we're lacking a good description of the problem.
>
> On Mon March 2 2009 06:31:09 Leonardo Coelho wrote:
> > I'm sorry but i don't get it, if i have this two lines:
> >
> > > local_transport = virtual
>
> Don't do this. It probably doesn't work anyway. We have address classes
> with proper *_transport defaults. The local_transport is of course
> local(8), which is designed to work with Unix users and traditional
> Unix system aliases(5).
There is nothing wrong with "local_transport = virtual", if one wants
virtual delivery with no aliases(5) processing or .forward processing
for all local users, but often setting mailbox_transport is a better
way to handle "local" (system-user) mail.
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majord...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
