DULMANDAKH Sukhbaatar пишет:
For me XFS seemed very fast. But usually I use ext3, which is proven
to be stable enough for most situations.
I feel also that xfs if much faster than ext3 and reiserfs, especially
when it deals with metadata. In some bulk operation (bulk changing
attributes of ~100000 files) it was approx. 15 times faster than ext3
(20 sec xfs, 5 min ext3).
xfs's journal covers only metadata, so you probally lose some lastest
not-synched data on power loss, but you will stay with consistent fs.
