On Fri Mar 20, 2020 at 03:10:18PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 01:47:48PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > Hi ports@
> >
> > After that we reached a stable level with Qt5 5.13.2. We can update our
> > KDE5 universe to the latest stable version. The update diff is pretty
> > simple. Removed some workarounds like Qt5 5.13.2 and so one.
> >
> > It is still huge and this has the following reasons:
> >
> > - KF5Auth split into KF5Auth and KF5AuthCore, which ends in a lot of new
> > WANTLIBs
> > - Upstream changes the xdg path from share/examples/***/xdg/ to
> > share/qlogging-categories5/, which ends in a lot of PLIST chages.
>
> another note on this, some dbus-1 files were also previously @sampled
> and its not the case anymore, dunno if that's expected.
>
> -share/examples/ktexteditor/
> -share/examples/ktexteditor/dbus-1/
> @sample ${SYSCONFDIR}/xdg/dbus-1/
> -share/examples/ktexteditor/dbus-1/system.d/
> @sample ${SYSCONFDIR}/xdg/dbus-1/system.d/
> -share/examples/ktexteditor/dbus-1/system.d/org.kde.ktexteditor.katetextbuffer.conf
> -@sample
> ${SYSCONFDIR}/xdg/dbus-1/system.d/org.kde.ktexteditor.katetextbuffer.conf
> -share/examples/ktexteditor/xdg/
> -share/examples/ktexteditor/xdg/ktexteditor.categories
> -@sample ${SYSCONFDIR}/xdg/ktexteditor.categories
> +share/dbus-1/system.d/org.kde.ktexteditor.katetextbuffer.conf
>
> missing @sample
> ${SYSCONFDIR}/xdg/dbus-1/system.d/org.kde.ktexteditor.katetextbuffer.conf
> here ?
No this is wrong. BTW nice catch! I will go through all @sample changes.
>
> i note that adding DEBUG_PACKAGES is nice, but how much size penalty does this
> bring to mirrors ? are those debug pkgs useful ? iirc so far cmake failed to
> provide useful debugging syms, so i dont see the point ofadding DEBUG_PACKAGES
> if they're not helpful.
The cmake issues is new for me. Let's remove DEBUG_PACKAGES and enable
it if we need special ports to debug.
>
> (note: the diff is huge because a large chunk of it is PLIST churn for an
> icons package)
>
> Landry
>
Yeah I know but it's not possible to do it in a nicer way. Thanks for
the review.
