On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 03:02:26PM -0600, Tracey Emery wrote: > Was I right to bump the REVISION on the two subs? Bumping gcc is obvoiusly correct because you patched and therefore changed the package; I'm not sure about gdb: does it's package change as well because requires gcc sources at build time?
If in doubt, bump - it's cheap and avoids problems. > I built this on amd64, sparc64 (generously borrowed from stsp and setup > by jca ... thank you), and i386 platforms. OK kn > @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ > +$OpenBSD$ > + > +Index: gcc/cp/cfns.h Please add a comment describing *why* you do this; *what* often fails to add value, but having a reason for patches in the description is always helpful and also nice to see during `make patch' output.
