> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2020 at 1:40 PM
> From: "Stuart Henderson" <[email protected]>
>
> On 2020/01/24 13:35, Aham Brahmasmi wrote:
> > Hi Stuart,
> >
> > > From: "Stuart Henderson" <[email protected]>
> > > Subject: Re: UPDATE fonts/overpass to 3.0.4
> > >
> > > Is it really useful to include webfonts in the font packages? 4 copies of
> > > the same fonts in different formats does seem a bit much.
> >
> > I may be wrong here, but the webfonts might be useful in serving html
> > content - the user may install the font package for the webfont files
> > and serve the webfont files along with html content using httpd/relayd.
>
> Not from /usr/local though.
Agreed.
I imagine one may perhaps want to setup some symlinks from
/usr/local/<fontfilepaths> to /var/www/htdocs/fonts. Or rsync fonts
using a daily cron job to that directory. On the httpd/relayd side, one
could perhaps create, within individual server sections, a
location "/assets/fonts/*" {
root "/fonts"
request strip 2
}
Dhanyavaad,
ab
---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--
